SecondSourceThe Second Source on AI

Gurley says OpenAI credits count as Azure revenue; Nadella says no — resolves 2026-09-15

Claim verdict: Contested Outcome: Can't be determined

Gurley says OpenAI credits count as Azure revenue; Nadella says no — resolves 2026-09-15

Scheduled check 2026-09-15 · settled 2026-09-30 (15 days late)

Claim verdict · Written on Aug 2, 2026

Background

The debate: Bill Gurley criticizes circular financing in AI (a big company invests in an AI company, which spends the money back on the investor's cloud) and says Microsoft counts the cloud credits it invested in OpenAI as Azure revenue.

Why it matters: if he is right, part of Azure's revenue is really Microsoft's own credits coming back, so its growth should be read at a discount.

Who is on each side: Gurley says the credits are booked as revenue and Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella says they are not, so one of them is wrong.

The call

Bill Gurley's circular-financing critique turns on a checkable accounting fact: whether Microsoft's FY2026 filings show OpenAI credits converting into Azure revenue. Gurley says they do; Satya Nadella says they do not. One of them is wrong.

Sources behind the call

BG2 Pod (Brad Gerstner + Bill Gurley)
“there's like six different transactions that have…”

BG2 Pod, with Sam Altman (OpenAI CEO) and Satya Nadella (Microsoft CEO) in person
“our investment of... 13 and a half which was all…”

The receipt

Check Microsoft's FY2026 10-K, or a subsequent 10-Q, for revenue-recognition or related-party notes: an identifiable disclosure of how OpenAI-related revenue or credits are accounted for settles the call; no identifiable disclosure makes it unresolvable.

Outcome

Can't be determined (settled 2026-09-30)

The prediction: the explanatory notes in Microsoft's financial reports would settle a dispute. Investor Bill Gurley says Microsoft counted the cloud-usage credits it gave OpenAI as part of its investment as revenue for Microsoft's Azure cloud business; Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella says it did not. How it would be checked, decided when the prediction was made: if the notes to Microsoft's annual or quarterly reports for its 2026 fiscal year spell out how OpenAI-related revenue is counted and how the credits are recorded in its accounts, the dispute can be settled; if they do not, the result is "cannot be determined". On 2026-09-30 we read Microsoft's annual report for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2026, filed with the US Securities and Exchange Commission on July 29. The notes give only two totals: $24.1 billion of revenue for the year from Microsoft's business dealings with OpenAI, including what OpenAI paid Microsoft under their revenue-sharing agreement, and $6.0 billion that OpenAI still owed Microsoft at June 30. The notes do not say how the credits were recorded, so neither Gurley's nor Nadella's account can be confirmed: cannot be determined. The check was due by September 15, a date set when the prediction was made, and came 15 days late.

Evidence used to settle it

sec.gov · checked 2026-09-30
“For fiscal year 2026, we recorded revenue from commercial arrangements with OpenAI, inclusive of revenue-sharing payments, of $24.1 billion, and accounts receivable from OpenAI as of June 30, 2026 was $6.0 billion.”